Redwall Wiki Clone - User contributions [en]

User blog comment:Silverfalcon Pikehawk/ Creed of the Assassin/@comment-71.217.216.249-20100208212907

2010-02-08T21:29:07Z

71.217.216.249: started new page.

I can't.

User blog comment:Shieldmaiden/Essay:Rebuttal to Good VS. Evil/@comment-71.217.216.249-20100207162420

2010-02-07T16:24:21Z

71.217.216.249: started new page.

true.

User blog comment:Lord Mactalon/Essay: 500 houses/@comment-71.217.216.249-20100207160904

2010-02-07T16:09:04Z

71.217.216.249: started new page.

yeah, but what?

User blog comment:Martin2/Essay:The Patterns of Redwall (Rough Draft)/@comment-71.217.216.249-20100207160226

2010-02-07T16:02:26Z

71.217.216.249: started new page.

anon., as in...?

User blog comment:Martin2/Essay:Is Madd from Taggerung Fwirl's dead mother?(Rebuttal)/@comment-71.217.216.249-20100207155931

2010-02-07T15:59:31Z

71.217.216.249: started new page.

I think that if Deyna was shot in the heart the arrow would act like a plug for blood.

User blog comment:Long Patrol Girl/Essay: The Declining Mental Health of Antagonists of the Redwall Universe/@comment-71.217.216.249-20100120204824

2010-01-20T20:48:25Z

71.217.216.249: started new page.

very true.

User blog comment:Dannflow/Essay:slings v.s slingshots/@comment-71.217.216.249-20100120203307

2010-01-20T20:33:08Z

71.217.216.249: started new page.

hey,is this thing some country other than America? I have no clue at all what you are talking about.

Essay:Asmodeus' Neutrality

2010-01-20T20:22:13Z

71.217.216.249:

{{essay|Ragals}}

'''Asmodeus''', one of the most interesting characters in the series, will be referenced in Doomwyte. But before we find out how prominent his reference is, let's look at his past. Many Wikibeasts say he is a villain, but I say otherwise. I view him as neutral.

1) He indiscriminately ate whoever was in his path, even if it was one of Cluny's crew. He couldn't be good, or else no Redwaller would be eaten, and he isn't a baddie, as I'm sure he would eat [[Cluny the Scourge]] and [[King Bull Sparra]] if he had the chance.

2) He kept treasure that he won through defeating his enemies. This behavior is comparable to medieval dragons in fiction, as they kept treasure in a similar manner. Medieval dragons were typically neutral (occasionally good or evil) and often had reason to destroy people who were taking his/her property. Keep in mind Asmodeus didn't destroy Redwall, but otherwise he behaved like a medieval dragon.

3) He was only killed because he was an obstacle in the path to success. [[Martin the Warrior]] knew [[Matthias]] needed to save [[Redwall Abbey]], so he had the snake offed. If the sword wasn't desperately needed to kill Cluny, Asmodeus would still be alive. Additionally, Matthias' own life was at stake because he intruded on Asmodeus' property. If Matthias died, so did Redwall.

4) Most reptiles in Redwall are neutral characters. The only exceptions thus far are the monitor lizards from [[The Pearls of Lutra]] (namely [[Lask Frildur]]).

And... sadly, my argument has flaws. Shall I argue against some of them?

1) Asmodeus' name: His name derives from a devil. '''Is that enough to make him a baddie though? You argue that Veil's name is an anagram of "evil" and "vile", yet the ''story'' is about him choosing between good and evil.'''

2) If Asmodeus were neutral, can we consider [[Skrabblag]] and other creatures neutral via this information? '''No, because Asmodeus doesn't belong to a particular faction. He is an individual, much like we Wikibeasts are.'''

3) He is indirectly responsible for the events in Mattimeo. '''True, but who is the antagonist in that book? Slagar or Asmodeus?'''

4) In Redwall, Asmodeus is described as being evil through numerous adjectives. '''Hmm... haven't thought on this one. The descriptions seem vivid enough. Too vivid, perhaps? Almost as if Kilconey were exaggerating...''' ''(Flaw from [[Essay:Asmodeus' Neutrality:A Rebuttal]])''
[[Category:Essays]]