Jump to content

Welcome to the Redwall Wiki, your communal Redwall and Brian Jacques information resource! Free registration eliminates the ads!

User blog comment:Argulor/Should unnamed characters recieve articles?/@comment-8072-20130815045803/@comment-1859920-20130828040442

From the Redwall Wiki Clone, your Redwall news and information resource.
Revision as of 04:04, 28 August 2013 by imported>ForrestFighter (Created page with "I think that is your opinion on the matter and no matter why you say, it seems that Trawnbull has made up his mind. I honestly think it doesn't really matter either way. As no...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

I think that is your opinion on the matter and no matter why you say, it seems that Trawnbull has made up his mind. I honestly think it doesn't really matter either way. As no amount of chattering will do anything for a point I might want to persist.

The point Trawnbull is making, is that the character didn't actually exist in a book, and therefore wasn't a tangible part of it- it didn't play a role personally. This also goes along with the idea of, "Well, was the character important (also position-wise)? Did the character have a large role when it was mentioned to exist?"

@TBT: Which does raise a valuable point, why do pages like THIS still exist too?

Retrieved from "https://redwallwiki.otterobservatory.com/index.php?title=User_blog_comment:Argulor/Should_unnamed_characters_recieve_articles%3F/@comment-8072-20130815045803/@comment-1859920-20130828040442&oldid=56726"