User blog comment:Argulor/Should unnamed characters recieve articles?/@comment-8072-20130815045803/@comment-1859920-20130828040442

I think that is your opinion on the matter and no matter why you say, it seems that Trawnbull has made up his mind. I honestly think it doesn't really matter either way. As no amount of chattering will do anything for a point I might want to persist.

The point Trawnbull is making, is that the character didn't actually exist in a book, and therefore wasn't a tangible part of it- it didn't play a role personally. This also goes along with the idea of, "Well, was the character important (also position-wise)? Did the character have a large role when it was mentioned to exist?"

@TBT: Which does raise a valuable point, why do pages like THIS still exist too?