Thread:LordTBT/@comment-9946467-20170219053940/@comment-9946467-20170808203809

LordTBT wrote: 1. Reverting admin edits isn't allowed. So you chose to violate the rules. That comes with consequences. 2. I don't have to give an explanation, but often I do. In the case of Spike, for instance, you received an explanation in the edit summary on Oct. 26. You chose to ignore that 3 times afterward. 3. Whether or not you like the explanation doesn't matter. Just because you don't receive an explanation, or you don't like the explanation, doesn't mean you get to revert the edit. I look at every edit made on this site.

There's not much more conversation to be had here. You're certainly allowed to edit, but as I've explained several times now, reverting if your edit has been changed by an admin is a no-no. That means no going back and adding things in. Thanks!

1. I understand reverting them isn't allowed, and I'm sorry about that. But I only did it because I didn't see any clear reason as to why you reverted my work. 2. Your reason for my edit to Spike was "Character template makes appearances quite clear. "Strange" is an opinion. Thanks." However, the page for Mr. Squirrel uses the same wording, and you never have had a problem with it.

You also said "This site has over THREE THOUSAND articles. Quite plausible an infrequently visited article may have an overlooked error for many years." Do you specifically remember what your reasons were for changing it in April 2015, after seven years in which you were seemingly fine with the note at the end?

3. OK, I'm sorry I keep reverting edits. But that's because a lot of the time, I feel you ignore my questions about why my edits are wrong, or give me too vague of an explanation. I get that it's your right that you don't half to explain, but by not doing so it just feels to me like you're undoing my edits for no reason, when I personally don't see anything wrong with them.

4. I'd also like to bring up my final edit before my last ban, to the Spike page. I refrained from reverting your last change to my edit, and simply added in a note that wasn't opinionated. And yet I was still suspended for it! And then there were my edits to the Joseph Bell page back in October, which were simply additions to the page, and yet were still reverted.

I don't mean to sound rude, but I feel like I can't edit anything here anymore without it being reverted.